Login

You are here:

Blog Volt Are you Permitted to Park Here?

Are you Permitted to Park Here?

APaulParking2Note: For more from Alexandra, visit the "Ask Alexandra" tab on the Chevrolet Volt Facebook page.

In California electric cars must technically have a ZEV parking decal on their rear window or bumper to avoid getting a ticket for parking at a spot reserved for electric vehicles. I drove my RAV 4 EV for four years before I got one and probably never received a ticket because that car had lots of stickers on it saying it was a electric vehicle. When I did hear about the decal, I sent away for one, mostly because I liked stickers as a kid and now, as an adult, there is nothing that pleases me more than a decal that say “zero emissions” on it. By the way, in case you are wondering (because I was), the word "decal" comes from the term decalcomania.

I sent my $17 check in recently so I could get a sticker for my Volt. The original law specifies that “For purposes of this section, ‘Zero-Emission Vehicle’ means any car, truck, or any other vehicle that produces no tailpipe or evaporative emissions,” so range extended vehicles like the Volt don’t qualify, but I thought I’d see if anything had changed. Today, my Plug In America newsletter informs me nothing has changed – yet. However, the California Assembly Transportation Committee has unanimously approved AB 475, which would expand the original law to include plug-in hybrids' eligibility for the sticker. This would legalize their parking at public chargers and EV parking spaces.

For the last decade, as long as the parking violations cop easily recognized your car as electric, no tickets were generally issued at EV parking spots, decal or no decal.  However, as more and more plug-in vehicles flood the market, it will become increasingly important for drivers to follow the letter of the law. My friend Chris just got ticketed when he parked his Leaf in a public charging spot, and he did not have a decal. Not only are municipalities writing more tickets to help with budget deficits, but traffic cops will be less lenient with electric vehicles as they become more mainstream. Most of the plug-in cars coming into the market are unassuming: no emblazoned emblems loudly touting their EV-ness, so they are harder to differentiate at first glance from a gas vehicle.

Check with your local DMV about any necessary permits to park at public chargers in your state.

Alexandra Paul is a longtime electric vehicle advocate, actress and former EV1 driver. She is working with Chevrolet to educate consumers about EVs and the Volt. Full disclosure, Chevrolet is paying her for her time, but her opinions will always be hers.

Comments (8)Add Comment
...
written by Richard Grahman, May 24, 2011
I charge the Volt a couple of times in front of the San Francisco City Hall. Last week I came back to find a $55.00 ticket on the windshield. I called the Metropolitan Transit authority and was told that the charging stations are only for city Hall employees. So much for encouraging EVs.
...
written by PerryW, May 23, 2011
I'm a huge volt fan but I don't have a problem with the volt not qualifying for ZEV parking privileges. It's not a ZEV and most of us that buy it are buying it because we can't live with the restrictions of pure EV's have. The people that have them deal with the restrictions of limited range and the necessity of charging it or you cannot drive it so I don't mind giving them exclusive rights to these parking spaces and charging equipment. The EREV/hybrid architecture of the volt gives us enough benefits, I don't think we need to have privileged parking rights too. Lets face it the volt uses gasoline, even if it's less than other cars, but it does have a tailpipe and doesn't belong in "EV only" parking places. That would be like giving out handicapped parking tags to everyone that was overweight. Sure they could benefit from not having to walk as far, but they really don't deserve it. Just my 2 cents.
...
written by Anthony L, May 23, 2011
I'm siding with TRONZ on this. A plug in hybrid like the volt doesn't NEED to charge their car with public chargers, but it can make the difference of making it home or not for an electric car. I like the volt a lot, and the 30-40 mile AER is pretty good, but where do you draw the line with plug in hybrids? If someone makes a PHEV that has an AER of 13 miles (prius) should that be allowed in EV parking? How about a PHEV with an AER of 3 to 5 miles?
My vote is if it has a tailpipe it's not parking in a parking spot for "EV's only". Go ahead an make "Hybrid parking" only designated parking if you would like, but there is no need for hybrids that slow charge and take up the few public chargers that are currently available for electric vehicles.
...
written by Jeff U'Ren, May 23, 2011
Also, I'd opt for a mirror tag. I don't like sticking stickers on my car. If I'm plugged in I shouldn't get a ticket because that's obvious to the cop that I'm a plugin car. If I'm parked in a charging spot and not plugged in and don't have any plugin ID, well that's just rude and I should get a ticket. If I get a ticket for not having a sticker I'm willing to go down and argue that, just like I have to argue many other types of stupid tickets here in Santa Monica.
...
written by Khyron, May 23, 2011
The cop who gave a ticket to your friend was a jerk, or an idiot.
...
written by Jeff U'Ren, May 23, 2011
I think I need a definition for public charging. If I park at City Hall? If I park at a ChargePoint charger? If I'm a member of a charging network and I'm paying for that parking garage spot, I think I'm entitled to park there and park there as long as I want as long as I'm willing to pay for the parking time. Volt or Leaf. Avoiding gasoline usage is the point of all plugin cars. Creating a second class of plugin cars because of range extending is exactly what the new law is trying to avoid. Parking and charging should always be first come first served to be fair. This will not be a problem as more charging becomes available and as battery technology makes range extenders obsolete. Having said that, I rarely use public charging for my Volt and I'm still able to drive 91% of the time on my battery. If ask, I would certainly give up my parking/charging spot, provided I can park somewhere, to a battery only plugin that needed a vital charge. Just like a gas car driver would give up there parking spot to someone that had a more compelling argument as to why they should have their parking spot. Like they have kids and you don't. :)
...
written by TRONZ, May 23, 2011
It brings up an important issue. I am all for Plug-In Hybrids staying in EV mode but not if it prevents a pure EV from charging. Public Charging for a Volt is a nice option but for pure EV's, charging up can be a requirement. This is why the law is written and makes sense. What would be a consideration is some EV spots made available for PI Hybrids but the majority for EV only. After all, there is a big difference between a Volt owner trying to stay in the narrow EV range of their car (for fun) and an EV owner needing a charge for his 80 mile trip home with kids in the back.
...
written by Brett Bullington, May 23, 2011
Thanks for the posting! I just went from a Prius to a Volt, so I need to have this EV sticker issue on my radar screen!

smaller | bigger


busy

Our Tweets

Follow Us On Twitter

Share

Facebook MySpace Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Google Bookmarks