Note: For more from Alexandra, visit the "Ask Alexandra" tab on the Chevrolet Volt Facebook page.
When it comes to getting the most range out of my electric cars, I have learned from the best: Paul Scott (seen here with me in the photo on the left) and William Korthof.
I drove 20 miles with Paul on LA freeways during rush hour, and he didn’t touch the brakes once. He says accelerating after braking is a major energy-eater, so he kept a good distance between him and the car ahead and an eye far in front to assess the clearest line so he didn’t have to brake. He only slowed down using the RAV “regen” button (which approximates “low” in a gas car but sends the energy wasted from slowing back into the battery). I was riveted. Even though it was 5pm, traffic was going a respectable 50 miles an hour, but there were a lot of cars on the road; not touching the brakes was no easy feat.
William has driven over 150 miles in his 2002 RAV 4 EV, while the farthest Ian and I have gone is 109 miles.
William’s hypermiling tips on surface streets include braking as little as possible when approaching a stoplight. This means keeping an eye far up front and using Regen to slow down, like Paul does. William accelerates as gently as possible when the light turns green. He likes a constant light foot on the accelerator (or “go pedal” as my friend Darell D at www.evnut.com calls it, since EVs don’t have a gas pedal). Here, I stray: I like to get the car up to speed (as slowly as my impatient self can handle) and then just tape the accelerator to keep it there. There are differing schools of thought here – is it better to keep the car at a steady pace or let it coast a bit and then nudge it back up to speed?
In the Volt, the Low gear also sends energy back into the batteries, and I use it to slow me down instead of braking like Paul and William use the Regen button in their RAVs. But because I like the forward momentum of electric drive, and Low doesn’t allow that, I remain in D for most of my driving.
There is, however, an interesting thread about the range benefits of driving in Low on this site.
One Volt driver believes driving in L gets better range, but he only gets 33 miles per charge and I get over 40 mpc unless I have to go up our 2.5 mile hill too many times in a day.
This blog is more up my D alley.I will have to ask my mentors, Paul and William, what they think about these Volt philosophies. Along with more experimentation in my Volt, I know I can become an even more efficient driver.
For now, I remain a diehard D driver.
Alexandra Paul is a longtime electric vehicle advocate, actress and former EV1 driver. She is working with Chevrolet to educate consumers about EVs and the Volt. Full disclosure, Chevrolet is paying her for her time, but her opinions will always be hers.

written by Alexandra Paul, February 21, 2011
written by wilhemina, February 21, 2011
written by Alexandra Paul, February 17, 2011
Mark Swain, Customer Advisory Board member, has encouraged me to drive in L for a week and see how my range is. I will do that and report back.
written by shade tree, February 16, 2011
written by stu, February 16, 2011
written by shade tree, February 16, 2011
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for new technology and the days of standard ICE vehicles are numbered, but IMO the Volt is more of a stop gap at best, and a costly one at that which I'm not sure if the environmental benefits even outweigh those of a traditional efficient car/hybrid and certainly don't dollar wise over the life of the vehicle.
written by Paul Scott, February 16, 2011
These are the consequences of driving inefficiently.
Before you criticize efficient driving, you might want to consider all the ramifications of how you drive on the innocent people who breathe the pollution you generate, the soldiers who fight and die so you can have cheap gas, and the horrible mess our economy is in because we have to spend 45% of our national trade deficit for foreign oil.
written by shade tree, February 16, 2011
written by Evan, February 16, 2011

Shadetree, an average car engine typically achieves an efficiency in the 30-40% range as you said, and yes oil and coal power plants are in the same ball park. But the number of oil plants is very low these days, and coal, well we've got tons of it all over the country so at least we don't have to buy it from the middle east. But then you're also forgetting about wind, natural gas, methane, and nuclear. A natural gas or methane turbine can reach efficiencies of nearly 60% (some of the methane even comes off of landfills). The last factor that you didn't account for is the refining of gasoline, which isn't the most efficient process in itself.
No the Volt's not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction. Until fuel cells and efficient hydrogen come about, or better batteries, you really cant get too far from the good ole ICE.